The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. (Romans 1:18-19 NIV)

The road to perdition begins with a first step. The path leading to LIFE begins the same way though they are diametrically opposed. Each takes us to a destination.

Joshua was told to proclaim blessings for Israel on Mount Gerizim and to pronounce curses on Mount Ebal. Two mountains that represent two outcomes. One could stand on one mountain or the other, but not simultaneously on both.

Blessings or curses are a choice with each step. At one time, we all stood in the middle. Would we love the truth or suppress it? Would we hate the lie or delight in wickedness? Then we decided.

In Romans 1:18, initially on the road to perdition our attention is turned to those who suppress the truth by their wickedness.  Paul does not focus on the liars–not at first. It is the “truth-suppressors” who incur the wrath of God. We could write volumes about how truth is being suppressed in our universities, in the news media, in government, in business or in the halls of justice, yet we ignore suppression in the church. It is not what is said in pulpits, but what is omitted that stirs heaven’s indignation.

Placebos are not a lie, they just substitute for what is meaningful. It is common for spiritual leaders to feed entire congregations placebos. In doing so, they suppress the truth, though God has made it plain to everyone that His judgment is close at hand.

While in Florida this Spring, my wife and I visited a large retirement village. As I scanned the community’s newspaper, I asked our host if the paper had any political leanings, left or right. He said, “It is a feel-good paper.” For their readers, everything was always rosy. There was no evil to report. No lies needing exposed. No hard truth to declare. This is what we mean by truth-suppression. It’s where the road to perdition starts for the good folks.

Truth-suppressors have exchanged the truth of God for a lie (Romans 1:25). Truth-suppressors set their Bible aside and reject God’s counsel. So, without a truth orientation, they are unwittingly led up Mount Ebal. The lie is a default position. If we do not stand firmly on Scripture, we will fall for the lie.

They have lied about the LORD; they said, “He will do nothing! No harm will come to us; we will never see sword or famine.” (Jeremiah 5:12a)

No one who loves the truth sets foot on the road to perdition. “Christians” whose prophets prophesy lies, and priests who rule by their own authority, are living in La-La Land. But what will these people do in the end? (Jeremiah 5:31)

The substitute for the truth is where the road to perdition starts. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6) Beware, my friends, of the suppressors.

While people are saying, “Peace and safety,” destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape.   (1 Thessalonians 5:3 NIV)

Last January, a report surfaced from the U.S. West Coast that billionaire businessmen were building a secure underground community. Though they don’t fear God, these Silicon Valley titans of technology want to be saved from that which they do fear.

Mentally, American Christians are being encouraged to take a similar approach. They live under an illusion of peace and safety. “If there is a disaster, Jesus will keep me safe” –or so they believe. The Lord will shelter them “from” rather than his actual promise to take them “through” (ex. Isaiah 43:2-3a).

God’s desire for his servants is to obey and believe, not doubt or fear. Escaping trials is the exception for the saints, while enduring them is the rule.

In the last days, teachers of the Pre-Tribulation Rapture (PTR) position will be responsible for a great multitude of those who fall away. They paint a picture of safety that does not square with Bible prophecy. Amillennial teachers will be accountable also. Denying the literal warnings of the Bible’s prophets, with intellectual-sounding arguments, is the devil’s work. The signs of a looming day of disaster are unmistakable or why would rich people be digging big holes for condos in Kansas?

Doing nothing is not an option. Noah’s ark of refuge had to be under construction long before the deluge began. What the saints need to build are self-supporting communities around prophets in the mold of Elijah, watchmen who are sounding the alarm of impending disaster. (God has raised up contributors to this blog for this purpose.)

One of Satan’s schemes for destroying God’s people is to cause them to sin, so the Lord himself slays them as punishment for disobedience (Exodus 32, Numbers 25, Joshua 7, 1 Kings 13, et. al.). The peace and safety crowd are rebelling against God’s Word by ignoring the commands to be ready, to watch and to pray (Luke 21:34-36). They add more guilt to their sin by ignoring judgment and proclaiming disaster will not befall them. They are being deceived. They live under an illusion of safety.

 All the sinners among my people will die by the sword, all those who say, ‘Disaster will not overtake or meet us.’ ” (Amos 9:10 NIV)

Go to the ant, you sluggard; consider its ways and be wise! (Proverbs 6:6 NIV)

As a child, in the early evening, a favorite game at family gatherings with our cousins was “Hide n’ Seek”. Our home was ideal with trees, bushes and other wonderful places to hide. Our big maple tree served as home base. The person who was “It” covered their eyes, faced the tree and started counting. When they reached fifty they would shout “Ready or not, here I come!” When we heard “Ready or not” we would freeze in place. You did not want to be the first spied or caught. That meant you would be “It” the next round. What a thrill to race to the tree, touching it and yelling, “All-ee, all-ee in free.”

The game took some forethought. The time for hiding went fast, so you better have a plan before the counting started.  In life we do not have the benefit of a countdown. Things happen unexpectedly; things from which we cannot hide.

With the debate over when Jesus will re-appear, it may be overlooked that death could find us long before this age ends. Ready or not is the question. We all need to be ready, not for an “any moment” rapture, but for an “any moment” end of life.

This does not mean discussing the timing of Christ’s coming is irrelevant; it has total relevance. We don’t know what tomorrow holds, but it will matter greatly to survivors we helped prepare. Our test will be whether we are ready for either eventuality, and whether or not we love truth.

(The peril facing those who absorb Pre-Tribulation Rapture (PTR) “imminent return of Christ for his Church” teaching is that they will not be ready for “the Great Tribulation” (Daniel 12:1, Matthew 24:21, Revelation 7:14). God’s Word clearly states it will indeed happen, and that it must precede Christ’s return for his saints. (In our book Lifesaver we offer 24 Biblical and rational torpedoes that sink the PTR ship.)

The centuries old saying of Benjamin Franklin is true: “By failing to prepare you are preparing to fail.” There is no guarantee we will live to see the thing we prepare for, but we are guaranteeing a disaster if we see the thing for which we are unprepared. So will we be ready for what Christ promised (The Great Tribulation) or not be ready because we paid no heed? Ready or not, it is coming!

 “…to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.” (Luke 1:17b)

Next time, we will look at some practical goals preparing us for the last days.


He who was seated on the throne said, “I am making everything new!” Then he said, “Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true.” (Revelation 21:5 NIV)

With most people, new creates a conflict. New technology is welcomed by a small number who like it for the reason it is new. Leaders in the tech industry love this open-minded group. As with the developers, they think outside the box. They receive invitations to the unveiling of revolutionary new products. How this group, the “first wave”, responds will determine if the innovation becomes a business success.

Typically, people remain loyal to the familiar. This “third wave” is invested in “Group Think”. They prefer to wait and see what the first or second wave consumer thinks. This principle applies to anything new, not just technology.  The first wave, the pioneers, who review the new, open the door for the second wave; the second opens it for the third, and so on. There are many more in the second wave than in the first, but the greatest number belong to the third wave. This is the mass number that want to know if it is safe or if it is popular. By the time the fourth wave decides, ideas are already passe.

The Lord is making everything new. No improvement will be possible. Yet, because it is new, it is strange. Few are testing what the Spirit is now unveiling. Take, for example, the series, Prophets, Priests and Kings. I would classify it as first wave material. Strange, perhaps, in comparison to others on the subject, the public at-large remains unaware or dubious as to its value.

The test market of a select first wave of readers has offered their feedback. It is very positive. Any “problems” are minor and easily fixable. The importance to the reader is beyond calculation. Next up, The Priests of God should be unveiled in 45 days. It details more of the new thing Jesus spoke of in Revelation 21. 

The third wave of Group Think traditionalists; well, they may never get it. By definition, true reform must come from the outside. The third wave is stuck on the inside while the fourth wave is prisoner to the status quo.

If the motivation was to sell books, I would never write The People of God, The Prophets of God, The Priests of God and Lifesaver. There is no best-seller waiting to happen. The reason we, at this site, faithfully proclaim His strange, new design is to please Him. If we can help usher in the age’s last great move of the Spirit or awaken His chosen people to prophetic truth, then we will have succeeded. If we can alert those untouched by Group Think to God’s new thing, we will have done our job.

See, I am doing a new thing! Now it springs up; do you not perceive it? I am making a way in the desert and streams in the wasteland, to give drink to my people, my chosen, the people I formed for myself that they may proclaim my praise. (Isaiah 43:19-21)

In those days there was no king in Israel, everyone did what was right in his own eyes. (Judges 21:25 NKJV)

Having worked a few years as a real estate agent taught me a lot. For sellers of property, setting a price based on the fair market value, rather than what we hope our home is worth, is key to finding a buyer in timely fashion. For home buyers, it is vital to match what we can afford with what we want. The real in real estate is matching a seller’s reasonable expectation with a buyer’s financial ability.

So it is with the struggle often faced with prophecy. The current list of popular doctrines makes it a seller’s market, which means there are plenty of buyers considering a move from one position to another. Are the buyer’s unsatisfied with the status quo? Or has something forced a change? What is it they want? It is all subjective.

Objectivity is required as well. Being objective means I want facts. Subjectivity alone makes things murky. Facts clarify our options. Regarding prophecy, how do we arrive at facts? We must consult Scripture the way a real estate appraiser examines recently sold properties. If what we desire–that is our dreams or goals–conflicts with objective truth, then we have a choice. If we choose what we subjectively want to occur in the last days as opposed to what God objectively says, we won’t like what happens.

The Bereans were accustomed to teachers who were dreamers. How would they know if the Apostle Paul was like the rest? They listened intently to what Paul said; perhaps making notes. When he finished, the Bereans went back to their (Old Testament) Scripture to see if what Paul taught lined up with truth.

The Thessalonians, however, were more subjective. Salesmen could persuade them about what was right. Consider the context of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-2. Confusion caused panic in the Thessalonian church. It came about because their subjectivity made them vulnerable to false prophecies, reports or letters about the Day of the Lord. They had listened to Paul but forgot the Biblical evidence. Many thought he was right; that is until the next gifted public speaker came along.

God has put eternity on our hearts (Ecclesiastes 3:11). Eternity is our dream. The way we achieve the unimaginable is contained in the word of God. Applying the five major rules for Bible interpretation is how we arrive at the facts. Demand accuracy in prophecy, rather than argue about who is right. Information is true or it isn’t. God is objective, not subjective. God is Mathematics and true science. God does not tolerate “adding to” what he has spoken (Proverbs 30:5-6).

In the time of the judges, subjectivity led to confusion in Israel. Everyone did what seemed right because Israel had no sovereign to set the standard. Had God been their king, they would have all agreed.

That’s where many are at today; subjectively shopping for what’s “right”. In other words, most are searching for their wants and trying to fulfill their dream. Instead, wouldn’t it be better to study our Bible with other Bereans? What if we developed a consensus for an accurate (a.k.a. Biblical) interpretation of prophecy (1 Corinthians 14:1-4)?  Isn’t it better to prize accuracy rather than the human standard of what seems right?

A whip for a horse, a halter for a donkey, and a rod for the backs of fools!  Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you will be like him yourself. Answer a fool according to his folly, or he will be wise in his own eyes. (Proverbs 26:3-4 NIV)

If you’re asking “Where’s Part 1?” my answer is I do not know. It vanished, at least for now. But, as promised, we will proceed with Part 2 of “Contrived Arguments” in hopes that Part 1 can be found. First, what are “Contrived Arguments”?  My definition is this: A contrived argument is a charge or accusation created from whole cloth or made up out of someone’s imagination. The purpose is to promote a larger, hidden agenda. For contrived arguments to work, they need a promoter and willing dupes who are inclined to believe their narrative.

We could offer scores of examples, but let’s pick one. One of the leading early members of the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), Dr. Bernard Nathanson, was a powerful advocate for a woman’s right to a safe, legal abortion.  His conversion to Pro-Life is detailed in his book “The Silent Scream”. Dr. Nathanson reported how, from the inside, he participated in the contrived argument that “68,000 women die annually from complications of ‘backyard’ abortions. Therefore, to save lives, women need safe, therapeutic abortion.” Willing accomplices at the World Health Organization (WHO) and The Guttmacher Institute published graphs and statements to back up the NARAL story. Sympathetic media ran with it and the rest is history.

To explain how contrived arguments work, I want to repeat something written in a recent post. “The one who forms the argument, in all probability, will win the argument.” It is easy to figure out why. For one thing, it is impossible to disprove a negative, such as an accusation (ex. “How many times have you hit your wife?”) Challenging the fabricator will fail to convince anyone who is sympathetic to their cause. Also, the one who contrives the argument has the advantage of considering potential counter-attacks and preparing for them beforehand.

Let’s say I claim: “The Russians stole the 2016 presidential election.” Here’s another: “Fossil fuels are destroying the planet.” What about this one: “Modern Bible translations have corrupted God’s Word. The only reliable version is the inspired and infallible Authorized King James.” Try to rationally dispute these statements with an ideologue and it will probably result in frustration.

Here’s a popular contrived argument. “The Church will be taken up in the rapture before the Tribulation. Anyone who disagrees does not believe the Bible.” (The roots of this contrived story are in Lifesaver: Saving God’s People from the PTR Ship.) When the preacher pounds on the pulpit, becomes red in the face, holds his Bible in the air and yells the above, it tends to discourage honest debate. That’s the purpose. Unanswered propositions embolden the accuser so they feel wise in their own eyes.

Be aware of false narratives that have made their way into our culture—even the culture of the Church. Challenge them with Scripture, facts and rationality. You may not save everyone from believing contrived arguments, but you can at least save yourself from yielding to the lie. It is more important to stand for truth than it is to win the argument.

You were running a good race. Who cut in on you and kept you from obeying the truth? That kind of persuasion does not come from the one who calls you. “A little yeast works through the whole batch of dough.” (Galatians 5:7-9 NIV)

The Allied World War II commander in the Pacific, Douglas MacArthur, once stated he only believed 5% of what he read in his intelligence reports. If General MacArthur were still in command, he might be even more skeptical. The difficulty with copying his approach is what 5% are we supposed to believe?

Intelligence briefings for the average Joe is packaged in news reports. What we hear, read or see is communicated by people who supposedly are in the know. From whom do these journalists receive their briefings? From intelligence or official sources in high places? If the 5% rule applies to the news’ sources’ sources, then how much remains to believe? Of the little that is fact, how do we tell the difference between it and fiction? Could 5% be true or is it a lot less?

The Apostle Paul understood the negative potential of the lie. He could not stand guard, monitoring who said what to whom. Believers, then as now, had to fine-tune their personal truth detection system. Like MacArthur, each had to detect the false in every report. “A little yeast works its way through the entire batch,” he warned.

This is where we need critical thinking or skill in making distinctions. I’m not merely referring to news sources, but to what Paul was addressing. He was upset by the lack of discernment among God’s people and by the little white lies (leaven) hindering the saints in Galatia. Paul had invested a great deal of time and effort. Would it be for nothing?

Lies take good people off track, preventing them from running their race. Opportunists cut in and divert attention and energy from the pursuit of God’s call.

Many of our distractions are “contrived arguments”. They are fake news or false stories. They are made up, a ruse, a trick, a strategy to lead one astray. Like pie and ice cream to the dieter, clever-sounding arguments entice the curious to indulge themselves. The little white lie we swallow today props the door open for the family of deceit tomorrow.

In Part 2, let’s expose some contrived arguments that threaten to undo us.

For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.” (1 Corinthians 1:19 NIV)

Some say the greatest threat to humankind is ignorance. I’m not so sure. There are some highly-educated, super-intelligent individuals out there we should be real concerned about. Intelligent or not, the lie is no respecter of persons. Among the elite or among the uneducated poor, wherever falsehood finds a home, destruction will follow.

Satan is the father of all lies, so the Lord has declared war on deceit’s perpetrators. He will destroy the wisdom of the wise. He will frustrate the intelligence of the intelligent.

The recent U.S. headline read: “Scientists take to the streets to defend research.” What was this all about? Who is against scientists doing research? Digging into the report, it seems “scientist” is the title belonging to “Climate Change Advocates.” (Remember when Climate Change used to be Global Warming?) So scientists and concerned friends of the environment (like scientists, another warm and fuzzy name) were raging against the threat of funding cuts and the problem-causing Climate Change Deniers (a not so warm and fuzzy name).

In most cases, the Climate Change Deniers are scientists also, only their research shows the “good” scientists are committing fraud.  These “bad deniers” who hate science (boo, hiss) want to reduce tax-payer funding for the Climate Change scientist’s intelligent and wise research. The bottom-line is that there are rumors the evil President Trump (not warm and fuzzy) is considering shutting off the spigot of federal money that for decades has flowed non-stop to universities and scientists. That’s what made them mad enough to spend their Saturday chanting slogans and protesting.

In Brian Sussman’s monumental, “Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global Warming Scam” (WND Books), researchers for truth are introduced to the dark side of science. He describes the disaster scenario that “carbon emissions generated by mankind are ruining the planet” started as an attack by socialists and Communists on Western society.  His documented investigation reveals “the motives, practices, and ultimate agenda of these radical agents of change” calling it a “web of deceit being sold as concern for the environment.”

America and the world’s challenge is how, after decades of opportunity to weave an elaborate tale, do we extricate ourselves? It is not that we are ignorant and unschooled about the dangers to the polar bears, it is how much propaganda have we swallowed? Though nearly twenty trillion in debt, why not continue to support junk science, even though, on the side, researchers are pocketing $ billions on their scam?

There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers. (Prov. 6:16-19 NIV)

We did not follow cleverly invented stories when we told you about the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty… And we have the word of the prophets made more certain, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. (2 Peter 1:16, 19 NIV)

Since Adam and Eve, the weakness of listening to humans rather than obeying God has been a major character defect. We swallow cleverly invented stories and disregard the prophets. Masters of argument take the spotlight while truth-tellers are denied an invitation.

One evening, after a rousing performance before a Christian crowd, I asked a popular preacher a simple question: “According to the Bible, who will appear first to receive the praise of millions of adoring worshipers. Is it the Antichrist, or will it be Jesus Christ?” Then I listened for his answer. There was a long pause. I was non-confrontational, but it was a direct question, one for which every believer should have a ready answer. I posed this important question to a preacher who boasts of hundreds of memorized Scriptures.

Instead of saying Christ will come first or the Antichrist, the Pre-tribulation Rapture (PTR) teacher and preacher replied, “You are Pre-Wrath Rapture (PWR) aren’t you? I know all about Rosenthal and the other guy.” (He was referring to Marvin Rosenthal and Robert Van Kampen, the pioneers who first presented the PWR position.) My question was deflected by his. Instead of answering with the Bible, I was labeled. Our conversation was officially over.

Do not confuse good preachers or debaters with sincere truth-seekers. Truth-seekers are humble. They do no self-promoting and little talking. They listen and ask probing questions. Like the Bereans with Paul, in Acts 17:11, “…they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.”  They examined the Word, not the playbook, not the notes, or the book on the Bible by their favorite author. For the Bereans there was only one source of authority, what we call the Old Testament.

Herein, lies a major problem with contemporary Christianity. We have piled up learning on the New Testament, but we lack the knowledge that serves as a foundation for truth. Most of the first 39 books of the Bible are missing from our faith. As a result, our building only goes up 27 floors and starts on the 40th floor. How can we discern truth from error if, in Jesus’ words, a rebuke to the Sadducee’s, “You don’t know the Scriptures or the power of God”? So preachers or teachers can say whatever and call it New Testament doctrine, but it does not square with Genesis through Malachi. One of the five basic rules of interpretation is “Before we arrive at truth, all seeming Scriptural contradictions must be harmonized.” This rule applies to all of the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation.

Let’s return to the question I gave the preacher. It is my way of separating truth-seekers from dogmatists or ideologues. If a PTR follower answers “the Antichrist,” then they have undermined their keystone “any-moment return of Christ” argument. If they say Christ appears first, they are in error. (Consider for a moment the implications of being wrong.) The reactions are interesting when I offer prophetic evidence for the truth:

Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered together with him, do not let anyone deceive you… for that day cannot come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction.” (2 Thessalonians 2:1-3)

Truth-seekers will take it in, examine the passage and ask for more. In that case, we could go to Daniel 7:23-27 and 8:23-25, then follow up with Matthew 24:15-31. It is my experience years of human indoctrination will outweigh the Biblical contradictions. A truth-seeker is a rare and priceless jewel. They will appreciate the correction.

(Amillennialists who reject a literal interpretation of end times prophecy are even more difficult. They have been taught to use reason and dismiss everything pertaining to Jesus’ glorious return to earth.)

Most trained in PTR doctrine are cult-like. They muddy the water then shift focus from Paul’s teaching in 2 Thessalonians 2. Some become upset. Some use insults or change the subject and walk away. They teach Bible study three times a week, yet are unwilling to acknowledge the truth. They “cherry-pick” the Bible looking for support of what they believe. They avoid Scriptures that challenge their version of the truth.

Recently, God led me to a Christian TV program where I witnessed PTR experts in action. There was no real debate of opposing views. Instead, the moderator posed PWR arguments, serving them up like softballs to his expert guest. My interest was piqued when the moderator went to 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3. There was no reading of the passage or breaking it down or comparing it with other Scripture. There was only a general statement that Paul’s teaching was being used against the PTR position.

The guest was ready. Words came faster than the mind could process. He said, “So glad you asked me” as if the question was not prearranged. Each sentence could have been challenged, but the format made it impossible. After a verbal barrage, the expert cited a meaning for the Greek apostasia, in verse 3. Most English translations have “apostasy”, “the falling away” or “the rebellion”. His translator was an unknown (probably a PTR advocate) who translated apostasia “departure.” That was all the guest needed. With a word like “departure” that could mean “departure from the truth,” he gave it a twist and out came an emphatic “the saints depart, and there is your Pre-tribulation Rapture!”

Everyone on the show was happy. They went home satisfied PTR was right; their argument won. Clever. A brilliant invention. The only casualty was truth.

What went wrong? We have to go to Jeremiah in the Old Testament to hear it from God.

A horrible and shocking thing has happened in the land: The prophets prophesy lies, the priests rule by their own authority, and my people love it that way. But what will they do in the end? (Jeremiah 5:30-31)

What will the masters of argument, or their disciples who love their ways, do in the end?

They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over weak-willed women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to acknowledge the truth. (2 Timothy 3:6-7 NIV)

Decades ago, I went to a mechanic for help with a “knocking” noise in my automobile. He convinced me the only solution was to replace the engine. As it turned out, I needed an oil change. The expensive fix was prescribed by a man with clever speech. There was nothing clever about my friend who changed my oil and saved me a lot of grief.

In Part 1, I attempted to highlight a group of very clever people. They are gifted talkers and writers. They love to dominate political and spiritual discussions. They have mastered a strategy for winning arguments. They are skillful at deception persuading trusting souls into making unwise decisions.

In terms of their argument, I want to break down what I have observed: First, they are acknowledged as experts. (Who can disagree with an expert?) As an authority they are able to frame their argument (ex. climate change is man-made, it is a woman’s right to choose because it’s her body, the Russians interfered with the U.S. election, etc.) Whoever frames the argument dictates the direction.

Next, I notice they talk fast.  After their initial premise they rip off several other assertions in rapid-fire order. The pace is so fast the first point usually gets lost, therefore, it cannot be addressed separately.

Generally, they stress their first assertion is “accepted by scholars” so who dares question it. In other words, one would have to be a heretic to disagree. It comes out like this: “Of course, we know that…” and goes from there. The second point is built on the foundational statement–disputable though it may be. Since they launch a continuous string of sentences, it is impossible to interject without sounding rude.  Three or four questionable statements can be made while thinking of the first faulty assumptions. (My mind tried to wrap around the idea of an engine replacement while the mechanic droned on about the why.)

(Note: If the foundation is laid on an error, all that follows has to be wrong also. In logic, a premise that creates a diversion is known as “a straw man”.)

The next thing I notice is how arguers subtly misrepresent their opponent’s position. (“Did you really say in your book…?) Twisting some words, attaching meaning to a sentence other than the one the writer intended, or taking a statement out of context, are all techniques to undermine credibility. They make the opponent look bad and place them on the defensive. No writer or speaker wants to be misunderstood or accused of questionable orthodoxy. Trying to correct the record leads to the next phase of the attack.

Once their opponent defensively tries to explain themselves, the arguer shuts them down. (For example, the arguer will say, “May I finish! I did not interrupt you! Please  allow me to at least complete my thought? Thank you!”) The arguer is cool and controlled while their opponent suffers a rebuke. To remain on the attack, the arguer inserts little digs, such as, “I know you are an educated man, but surely, you do not believe what you just said.” The attempt is to make the opponent feel small.

Imagine what it is like to be the opponent. To stay above the attack is a challenge. To the arguer, opponents must be humiliated. From where does the hostility come?  For arguers it is war. The goal is to win. Prestige among their peers follows. Who then, according to Ephesians 6:12, are the arguers serving?

More could be added including the circular reasoning often employed. Be aware of the arguers strategy, but, in humility, eagerly pursue truth. Stand to defend truth, speak it in love and take the abuse. It isn’t always about winning.

In Part 3, we will present a diagnostic question with which we can determine if the people with whom we share it are truth-seekers or unable to acknowledge the truth.


Lifesaver Book

Purchase Online Here - Also available in eBook, Kindle, & Nook.

Prophets of God

Purchase 2nd Edition Online - Now available in Kindle, Nook, iTunes and eBook

The People of God

Purchase Online - Available in eBook.

Follow Me on Twitter